Friday, February 18, 2011

Congresswoman Betty McCollum Receives More Death Threats, Another Cascade in the Avalanche of Violence

Minnesota's Six Term Congresswoman for the 4th Congressional District, Betty McCollum, serves on the House Appropriations and Budget Committee.  Equally attractive and of a similar age to the more notorious and crazy extremist Congresswoman from Minnesota, Michele Bachmann, McCollum is everything Bachmann is not - including far more reality based, and able to pass a fact-checking test.  Unlike Bachmann, who has ZERO true fact checks (and some pants on fire lies) McCollum has two 'true' ratings.

McCollum, a Democrat, is receiving death threats, for trying to save money by making more sensible and sane budget cuts in proposed Amendments to bills in Congress.  A good case can be made that the Republicans and Tea Partiers are not so much interested in actual budget balancing and fiscal conservatism as they are in attacking agencies and programs which benefit the middle and less affluent demographics of our society who are more likely to vote democratic.  It is not so much fiscal responsibility as party warfare in that guise, with Republicans acting like wolves in sheep's clothing.


So far, at least to this writer, McCollum's proposals are aimed at actual, realistic budgeting of discretionary spending, not taking food out of people's mouths.  Those ideas make a lot of sense.  One of those ideas is to put a lower ceiling limit on the budget for military bands - yes, MUSIC by the Military.  Nothing which would make us less safe or threaten the actual defense of our country, (unless a few more men in uniform with tubas for some reason make you feel safer).  Unlike for example, the wasteful spending on the SECOND airplane engine made in and near the district of John Boehner that the military has tried to unload for years, but couldn't because it is part of what Boehner relies on to keep getting elected.  That money, in the billions could have been better used to take care of our vets. Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, in contrast, wanted to cut support to our veterans, although she has since backpedaled from that proposal, for now. 

Here is the wasteful spending that McCollum is looking at limiting (but not completely eliminating) courtesy of an excellently researched post at MN Roundtable:
And speaking of “horns” and the military, Betty McCollum (D-MN-04) wants to curtail military band funding. According to MPR, McCollum also introduced an amendment to limit spending to $200 million per year on “military bands, musical equipment, or musical performances.” The Pentagon told McCollum’s office it currently spends $339 million annually on military bands, $305 million of which goes to personnel costs.” The congresswoman believes that anything in excess of $200 million is excessive,” Bill Harper, McCollum’s chief of staff, said, noting that a $78 million program to support homeless veterans was put on the chopping block by House Republicans.

Well, that should be Music to the ears of fiscal conservatives, but it really should be a lot more.

Walter Pincus writes that Defense Department spending could reach $500 million or more a year.

Consider these interesting tidbits :

– The Marine Corps spent $50 million last year on its military bands, including $10 million to support the 130 elite musicians in the Washington-based Marine Band, known as “The President’s Own,” whose prime mission is to provide music for the White House. The Marine Band is to get a 2 percent annual increase in its spending budget. The Marines have another 600 musicians in 12 bands around the country, costing $35 million, according to a Corps spokesman.

– The Army estimates that it spends about $195 million a year on its bands, but that does not include those of the National Guard. Altogether, the Army says on its Web site that it has 5,000 musicians, describing itself as “the largest and oldest employer of musicians in the country.”

– Another unusual aspect of the bands is that those representing the Army, Navy and Air Force military academies are not cadets attending the institutions. Rather, they are professional musicians enlisted in the services and assigned to those academy bands.

– Besides the Army Band, known as “Pershing’s Own” — based in the Washington area — which, is authorized to have 250 officers and enlisted men. Then there is the Army’s Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps, West Point’s Military Academy Band, and the Army Field Band, located at nearby Fort Meade, Md. These are known as the Army’s “special bands.”

But there are also three large Army bands: the Army Training and Doctrine Command Band, at Fort Monroe, Va.; the Army Ground Forces Band, at Fort McPherson, Ga.; and the U.S. Army Europe Band and Chorus, stationed at Heidelberg, Germany.

In addition, there are 28 other regular Army bands in this country and abroad, 18 Army Reserve bands and 53 Army National Guard bands. Beyond that, almost every regular Army band has “music performance teams” (or MPTs) that can be “employed separately from the band headquarters in support of specific musical missions,” according to the manual. The Army Band, for example, has a ceremonial trumpet group, the Herald Trumpets; the Army Chorus; the Army Blues, a large, popular music group; a smaller pop group, Downrange; and a string element, the Army Strings.

Other bands also have smaller groups.

The Washington-based Navy Band, with 105 members and a 24-person support staff, has eight chamber music ensembles, plus the Commodores, a 19-person jazz ensemble; the Sea Chanters, a chorus of 23; the seven-person country bluegrass group Country Current; and a pop entertainment ensemble, the Cruisers, with two vocalists and six instrumentalists.

In addition, there are two Navy bands in Japan and Italy, one in Hawaii and eight across the U.S. mainland. For example, there is the Navy Band New Orleans, which has not only a ceremonial/marching unit but also the Express (top 40/variety); Navy Showband South (show/dance); and the Crescent City Brass Quintet Brass Band (traditional New Orleans), according to its Web site.

Located in Washington, the Air Force Band has 180 musicians along with it own “staff of music arrangers, composers and copyists who create many of the works performed by the band,” according to its Web site. It, too, has a number of ensembles, including the Singing Sergeants and its newest group, Max Impact, “four of the Air Force’s most dynamic vocalists and supported by a hard-hitting five-piece rhythm section,” its Web site says.

The Air Force Academy Band has a marching band of 60; a concert band of 45; the Falconairs, an 18-member jazz ensemble; the eight-member Blue Steel pop/rock/country group; the five-man Wild Blue Country group; and five other subgroups.

In addition, there are 11 other active-duty Air Force bands, plus 11 Air National Guard bands. Nine active-duty Air Force bands tour in their own geographic areas in the continental United States while one is in Europe and another — the USAF Band of the Pacific — is stationed in Alaska, with elements in Japan and Hawaii.

The Marine Corps Band has about 160 members. Its ensembles include a Marine Chamber Orchestra, the Marine Jazz Orchestra and its country music group, Free Country.

– Becoming a member of the military’s “special bands” — which beyond the four Army bands include the Navy Band, the Naval Academy Band, the Air Force Band, its Academy Band and the Marine Band (“The President’s Own”) — gets you a ranking of staff sergeant or the equivalent and an annual salary of $51,000 for single people and $58,000 for married ones. The Coast Guard Band provides a ranking but slightly lower pay.

– Then there is the assignment. Take the Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps, for example. All members over their four-year enlistment period have “a stabilized assignment at Fort Myer, and enjoy full military benefits including medical and dental care, group life insurance coverage, 30 days of annual paid vacation, Post Exchange and Commissary benefits, and educational benefits,” according to its Web site.

Ms. McCollum’s proposal should require higher cuts … but after House Republicans failed to embrace cutting any of the 65 military boards and commissions that are considered unnecessary, just limiting the band budget to $200 million may be the best the taxpayer can hope.
The other big savings proposed by McCollum wouldn't hurt veterans either, or anyone else, while saving $100 million dollars.  This one, the ending of Pentagon sponsorship of NASCAR where the hope has been that the Pentagon advertising would generate enlistments, had caused Congresswoman McCollum to start receiving death threats - AGAIN.  Death threats bloggers on the right would like to pretend don't exist.  Here is a quote of McCollum from CNN which explains the very sensible cost analysis that McCollum is applying to her proposal:
"I would challenge the Pentagon to give me one example of someone today in Iraq or Afghanistan who saw the Go Army car going around the racetrack and that's why they joined the Army," Bill Harper, McCollum's chief of staff, told HamptonRoads.com. "It may be the reason why they go to Home Depot but not necessarily Afghanistan."
The gentle Congresswoman from Minnesota, Rep. McCollum, demonstrates that the left has women of equal attractiveness to the likes of Bachmann and Palin.  The difference is that they don't get the same attention, sadly, that the crazy popsies, queens Quitter of Twitter and Tea Party Extremism receive.  Bachmann is a Minnesota Loony, while McCollum is more of a Minnesota Luminary - providing light, but not heat - as evidenced by these proposals to the budget.

We need more McCollum-like ideas.  We don't need Bachmann's ideas, at all; she can't successfully propose legislation; and if she ever did manage any, it wouldn't be to benefit her constituents.  Well, maybe except for the humor value of Palin and Bachmann's statements, and the jobs they provides for the fact checkers who keep showing up their reasoning flaws and factual inadequacies.

4 comments:

  1. The problem with cutting the 500 mil from military bands is that it is not enough. Neither Democrats or Republicans (with the exception of some of the newer members from both parties) want to get serious about this. Obama says he is doing a spending freeze and submits a budget that is 3.7 trillion up from 3.1 or 3.3 trillion last yr, what kind of freeze is that? The Republicans say they are going to cut $100 billion and then try to cut only $50 billion until their newer members reminded them they promised 100 and even then they really only cut 68 the other 32 was increases Obama proposed that they were not passing. Both sides of the aisle are saying one thing and doing another. You cannot get there by taxing the rich, you could raise taxes to 70% on everyone making over 250k and it would not be enough to close the deficit and would probably just cause some more housing foreclosures. You have to make cuts in defense, social security, welfare, medicare, and medicaid. I bet if there was a serious effort made to cut out fraud and waste in those programs you could cut 10-20% without cutting anyones benefits. Allen West, new republican from Florida and former Lt Col, said he could find 20% to cut from the pentagon in waste and fraud. He pointed out that normally admirals command a fleet and captains command a ship but right now we have more admirals than ships. A lot of the general public is watching this and I bet that in 2012 several more long term congressmen from both parties are shown the door for dragging their feet on this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tuck, no one is claimint that cutting the military band budget is going to be enough.
    What I am asserting is that cutting that budget (not eliminating it entirely) and cutting just plain stupid pork spending like the millions upon hundreds of millions of dollars spent on DUPLICATE EXTRA plane engines built because it keeps John Boehner in office not because it is useful to the military (there are warehouses of them already) is something that Republicans will not do, while blocking spending which does benefit the economy as multipliers - like unemployment benefits.

    Betty McCollum's amendment was booted by the Republicans yesterday for example - and it was a good one. Meanwhile we have Michele Bachmann who wants to hurt homeless vets by cutting spending which benefits them - and doesn't reduce the debt nearly as much as McCollum's proposal.

    McCollum's proposals DO deserve our support - both NASCAR sponsorsihp (unless they can produce a cost-benefit analysis to the contrary) AND the band cuts. Those should be done first, not rejected by Republicans.

    Shame on those Republicans! And double shame on anyone who makes death threats over NASCAR spending - if there were ever an area that did NOT deserve federal PENTAGON spending, I think we can all agree it is NASCAR.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First, THANKS for reading my commentary on the MN Political Roundtable. I plan to write about the NASCAR subsidies and supporters later, but did want to let you know that Ms. Bachmann did join with Congresswoman McCollum and Congressman Ellison in a losing effort to restrict this funding. It was an interesting vote … anytime that Nancy Pelosi and Paul Ryan join forces with this contingent of Minnesotans, that’s noteworthy. Sadly, Tim Walz and Colin Peterson joined with Minnesota’s three Republicans to defeat Congresswoman McCollum’s amendment.

    Congresswoman McCollum was a force in the Appropriations Committee … however since the take-over of the Congress by the Republicans who changed the rules to give Paul Ryan the power to determine funding amounts … so that the Appropriations Committee can only determine how to split the funding by function. Worse yet, the monies cannot be re-allocated for other needs. For example, if the funds were restricted to be used for NASCAR advertising, the monies could only be used for other Dept. of Defense programs (I suppose they could spend it on more comic books) but it could not be transferred to other functions … like the Transportation budget. Stupid, you say … the analogy is that your family’s budget must be cut as the medical bills are rising … but you cannot cut your food budget and use money to pay for medicine … so even if you are willing to eat dog food for dinner, you could not use that savings to pay for medicine. Let me say it again, STUPID.

    Worse yet, the House has now gone on recess – AGAIN – until February 28th … the last act was to approve the budget and Congresswoman McCollum’s other two amendments never got to be debated or voted on … yep, the Band Plays On.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Minnesota Central, first - welcomd to Penigma! We appreciate your reading and commenting here. Your post was excellent, and I do very much look forward to the follow up writing that you are going to do.

    With your permission, I will add your blog to our blog roll, just to make sure I don't miss anything new!

    ReplyDelete