Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Un-Presidented, Undefeated, Unattended: Has Palin Peaked?

What is fame? The advantage of being known by people of whom you yourself know nothing, and for whom you care as little. - Lord Byron

The highest form of vanity is love of fame. -George Santayana

Sarah Palin recently debuted her new movie with the improbable and inaccurate title of Undefeated.  In her crazy world view, she conveniently ignores that she was quite thoroughly defeated in the 2008 election for vice president.  That is like, well, like ignoring the 8 ton bull(shit) GOP elephant in the middle of the room.

What is more significant than any content in the widely panned movie, for which I could not find a single positive review, is that to me it seems as if Palin is winding down in popularity and influence.  I think she's 'peaked', and done so far too early.

Palin was very clever in capitalizing on her post 2008 campaign popularity; those who loved her didn't care about looking too closely at her lack of real accomplishment, or her ignorance.  They were curious, they were perhaps even charmed.  Palin did an excellent job of turning that interest in to self promotion to enrich herself; she made herself a relatively wealthy woman in doing so.


Palin's first sort-of book, in that she didn't write it, was Going Rogue, which because of bulk buyers who gave it away, as a premium for a magazine subscription for example, became a best seller....if you can call it selling when so many people received their copy for free, and the bulk buyers got their copies at a fraction of the jacket price.  Or because Palin bought so many copies herself to give away, above and beyond author's courtesy copies, in an attempt to fake popularity and contrive interest. The first book doesn't have the substance to be of lasting significance, nor did her second.

Her next book, American by Heart, another book she didn't write, had far fewer sales, reportedly off some 70% from Palin's first book.  If - big if - she can find someone to pay to write a third book for her, she would probably have to pay people to buy it, and even then, she'd probably have to publish it herself, through some vanity press.

Palin didn't cover herself with glory when she was on Fox News as a contributor / commenter; instead, it showed off how dumb she really is.
"Roger [Ailes, CEO of Fox News] thinks Palin is an idiot. People like her haven’t elevated the conservative movement.
Palin's debut on Fox News, which might have been expected to generate interest, had lower viewership numbers than the regular programming for that time slot, despite plenty of hype. Palin's reality show premiered with the curious watching to the tune of 5 million viewers; by the second episode, that had dropped by nearly half, to 3 million, a steep drop off.  Not only was Palin not particularly entertaining, but she left the show under the cloud of having benefited from the show directly from tax credits, benefiting from a law that she signed during her term as governor before she quit.  That was an inconvenient truth, one might say, in contrast to the policies to which she give lip service.

Then we have the snark wars between former BFF's Palin and Bachmann; Bachmann was more than happy to have Palin come help her with fund raising, when there was money in it.  Now....not so much; rival Bachmann is criticizing Palin for the same things the rest of us who are not right wing bobble-heads knew all along.  Bachmann's political advisor, GOP strategist Ed Rollins, very publicly said of Palin:
"Sarah has not been serious over the last couple of years," Rollins said on Fox News personality Brian Kilmeade's radio show. "She got the vice presidential thing handed to her. She didn’t go to work in the sense of trying gain more substance. She gave up her governorship."
While Palin has had fluctuations in generally high approval ratings among at least a segment of the right, mostly the further right, her approval ratings to be president have never been all that high among the larger electorate outside that base.  But even that limited approval has declined rather steeply, while her disapproval ratings are climbing.  From my former editor/boss over at PoliticusUSA last month, following yet another debacle illustrating her ignorance of history, (one that rivals her ignorance of geography):
The new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll has some bad news for Sarah Palin. Thanks to Paul Revere, her orchestrated publicity tour over Memorial Day weekend managed to lower her approval rating to 24%.

Sarah Palin overall favorable rating is 24%. Her unfavorable rating is 54%. When the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll was last conducted in April, 9% of those surveyed had a very positive view of Palin. After Paul Revere that number is 7%. Her publicity blitz did cause people that have a very unfavorable view of her to drop from 41% to 38%, but this was offset by an increase in those who had a somewhat unfavorable view of her from 12% to 16%.

In a January 2011 CNN poll, Sarah Palin had a 38% approval rating. By March, a Bloomberg poll had her sinking to 28%. In an April Washington Post poll, Palin’s approval with tea partiers fell to 60%, and her disapproval rating overall shot up to 55%. Later that same month, the NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll measured her approval rating at 25%.

To summarize, Sarah Palin’s approval rating when we began 2011 was 38%. It is now 24%. If the point of the bus tour was to make Palin more popular, then it was a gigantic fail on wheels.
Palin still can generate a lot of interest; her non-campaign campaign (similar to a non-denial denial) was a media circus.  But increasingly, that circus is not about taking Palin seriously; it is much more about waiting for her yet again to shoot herself in the foot, while that foot is in her mouth......and the to do the same with the other foot as she tries to spin a recovery from her initial gaffe.

Palin claimed to have ended her bus tour because she had jury duty.  Most media seems to have accepted that explanation, and moved on to cover more serious news.  But I became curious, when the movie debut was announced, to see how that convenient jury duty escape was working out for Palin. 
"The coming weeks are tight because civic duty calls (like most everyone else, even former governors get called up for jury duty) and I look forward to doing my part just like every other Alaskan," her message said.

Palin's Facebook post did not say when her jury service might start or when she had been summoned to serve.
I was left with the largely unanswered question, "WHAT jury duty?"  Apparently Palin only sort of, maybe, might at some future time, have jury duty.  Palin does not appear to have been called for jury duty at all, so one wonders what hypothetical civic duty Palin has that explains her abrupt ending of her bus tour:
The first day of the Sarah Palin jury watch passed with this simple recorded message to those called for jury duty: "Your services will not be needed on Friday, June 24.''

Those in the Palmer jury pool, which Palin has indicated include her, are to call back Friday night to find out about "possible service on Monday, June 27.

The former governor lives just up the road from Palmer in the small town of Wasilla, where she was once mayor. Local legal cases, however, are tried at the courthouse in Palmer.

The jury procedure in Alaska is to send jury duty notices to a small army of people. They are given a pool number. If their pool number is called, they are to report to the court house to await possible selection to a jury.
and the Alaska Dispatch subsequently went on to note that Palin did not appear even to be waiting around to be summoned to jury duty:
There appear to have been no jury calls for Palin's jury district from the time she posted the June 22 message until Tuesday. The Palmer court, however, on Monday summoned service numbers 201 through 400 to the court house at 8:30 a.m. Tuesday to await possible jury selection.

The pro-Palin website Conservities4Palin on Monday, however, posted that "Governor Palin looks forward to spending time tomorrow (Tuesday) with the people of Pella, Iowa, and enjoying the premiere of Stephen K. Bannon’s new film, “The Undefeated.” After that, she heads to Minnesota to join her daughter Bristol at a book signing for Bristol's new book "Not Afraid of Life" at the Mall of America. Then back to Alaska for jury duty."

So, how long can Sara Palin try to get mileage out claiming she is doing the civic duty that she isn't doing?
According to one conservative blog:
How long must I serve?

The time period during which you must be available to serve (called your "term of service") depends on the size of the court location where you serve. During your term of service you may have to call in or report to court periodically. You may not have to call in every day, but you must call on the days you are directed to do so.

In Anchorage, where the population is large and many trials are held each day, the term of service is either 5 consecutive days or, if you are selected to serve on a jury, the length of the trial.

In other courts, your term of service is either 30 days, 90 days or 1 year depending on the population of the area. In these courts, you may have to call in several days each month, and you may be selected to serve on more than one trial. The most days you might actually have to be present in court is 30 per year. However, you must complete any trial for which you are selected to serve as a juror regardless of how long the trial lasts.
We are four days away from when that 30 days of possible jury duty would appear to run.  Most of that time not only has Palin not been at the court house for jury duty, and not even physically in the state of Alaska, there doesn't appear, that I can find, any indication that Palin actually was ever called for jury duty.  But the queen of quit and twit needed a good excuse to bail after her blunders; given her track record, she needed an excuse that made her look civic minded, one that specifically USED the words civic minded.

Last week, when she was conspicuously NOT doing jury duty:



Sarah Palin, if you can't get people to pay attention to you on television, and you can't get people to buy your book, and you can't get people to attend your bid movie debut - in selected red states, where the deck should be stacked in your favor, and if polls indicate you are increasingly unpopular, who are you trying to fool?  You peaked, and you peaked way too soon for any future successful political run, certainly in the near future of say the next 18 months.  Because as hard as you try to get attention, people are increasingly bored with you, because you have no substance.  If you are not 'over', Sarah Palin, you seem at least to be headed in that direction; by 2012, at this rate, she'll be lucky if anyone is paying attention to her at all, much less voting for her.

9 comments:

  1. I've always wondered about a woman who would name her daughter Bristol.

    What type of boob is this woman?

    Or the people who would vote for her?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Palin never has been any more than a sound bite lady. She's a nice looking woman who delivered a heck of a speech at a national party convention. Her subsequent behavior effectively scrapped the McCain presidential bid.

    What is scary is that those sorts of presentation skills are being seen more and more as a primary qualification for leadership in this country. When the behind-the-scene "handlers" become more important than the on-the-scene "candidate" - we have reason to fear.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are correct, Leslie, absolutely. Sadly, so are some of the other candidates.

    What these superficial political figures have done however is to push the direction of political policy in an extreme direction.

    What these superficial political figures do is to use being sound byte figures for lucrative self-promotion at the expense of gullible people who embrace their ideology, to the detriment of our poltical reality in this country.

    Bachmann is at best a slightly more substantive figure, but not by much.

    What is sad is that there is an honorable and distinguished history of conservative women in the Republican party, women like Sandra Day O'Connor, Elizabeth Dole, women like Jeanette Rankin the first woman ever to serve in Congress.

    Sadly, to many of the men on the right in Congress are just as superficial, just as ludicrous and trivial in their thinking, and just as damaging to our governance and political discource.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That is like, well, like ignoring the 8 ton bull(shit) GOP elephant in the middle of the room.

    Great line!

    Unfortunately, Michele Bachmann is the new Palin. The lunatics who supported Palin are switching their attentions to someone who won't quit.

    And my opinion of the intelligence of the average American drops further every day.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think Bachmann is exactly like the next Palin, in that she appeals to the same ideological constituency. I suspect she shares Palin's addiction to the spotlight, and has a similar desire for power.

    And just as Palin was able to parlay that narrow but hyperactive base into personal wealth, without a commensurate need to accomplish anything whatsoever other than celebrity, I think Bachmann's plan is similar. I don't think she seriously believes she can win the nomination much less the presidency; but she will make the most of the slim possibility. When, not if, that fails, she will use the attempt to make herself rich.

    I'm just waiting to see if she's going to dump her girly boy husband along the way if he becomes too much of a liability from her adoring homophobes to her ambition. If guys like Nut Gingrich or Remember 9/11 Guiliani, or even John McCain can survive a divorce or two, politically, then why not Michele?

    I wouldn't be surprised if Bachmann emulates Palin as well, in peaking early, well before the actual election date in 2012.

    Always nice to hear from you WCG!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think we may be selling her a bit short. As a candidate for Governor, and then Governor, she was generally considered bright and at times, capable of paying good attention to issues.

    She could conceivably run for Senate or the US House, and I think in Alaska MIGHT have a shot at winning (they've never been particularly policy deep up there). IF she did so, and IF she served a term (or two if a US House Rep), she could re-emerge as a serious candidate.

    However, that assumes during that time she'd become more aware of the wider world, more conversant in the actual policy questions at hand, something she has failed to do since being soundly trounced in 2008.

    I think her book title, though, is appropriate, the only thing was missing was the second word..

    It should have read, "Undefeated Ego"

    With respect to the various comments, I agree with them all, especially Leslie's, the fact is we appear to be being spoon-fed propoganda by handlers for the likes of Bachmann (who used to extemporize but has stopped due to the many gaffes). Those handlers recognize they can't let their candidate speak without a script, but it's not exactly new, Reagan was the archetype, with McCarthy being the trail-blazer.

    The wonder has to be how it is that so many can chose to remain so blithely ignorant of the motives of the candidates and not see through the meaningless pablum which the nonsense these over-handled candidaes spew because expressing themselves as they really feel would result in falls like Palin has suffered. Perhaps sometime in the future, capitalizing on being in the spotlight for 15 minutes and then fading into obscurity as your "substance" gets exposed will be referred to as "pulling a Palin."

    In all candor, I don't think if Palin looked like Kay Bailey Hutchinson, she'd have retained her popularity. That's hardly a sexist comment about HER, but it is saying too many conservatives are rampant sexists, for all they appear to look at is appearance. When the spotlight shines too brightly, and the fakery is exposed, each candidate in turn, whether it's Rand Paul, Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann, looks more and more like Norah Desmond than Carey Grant.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, I don't think that Bachmann is exactly like Palin. In particular, I don't think she's as motivated by money as Palin is.

    Palin has gone for the money every time. I don't think she'll ever run for public office again, because she's making too much money now. Well, if her popularity wanes, she might try to give it another shot in the arm.

    But I don't think that Bachmann is motivated by money. I think she wants power, political power. She's on a crusade from God, and she won't give up.

    Palin is a quitter. And for everyone who cares about America, that's a good thing. Bachmann is obsessed with changing America. That's not a good thing, not at all.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think both Palin and Bchmann like power. From the news emerging about Bachmann's migraines being triggered by being thwarted in the caucus, and Palin's response to criticism, I think both of them lack the temperament needed to be in politics long term. Both have a history of going through staff at an unusually high rate of turnover.

    Bachmann has indicated she will not run again for Congress, if she doesn't get the nomination for presidential candidate. I'm thinking that means she will go for the money, maybe a book deal, almost certainly Fox News - no serious news network would have her, and probably go for the big speaking fees, along with a salary from a PAC. I don't see Bachmann doing reality TV (Bachmann and reality don't belong in the same sentence.) But I can see Bachmann having a bit better success with Fox, or maybe her own radio talk show, where she can be sure that there will be screeners so that only the cheerleaders and those with softball comments get through - in other words, if power eludes her, settle for the most possible money.

    ReplyDelete
  9. no, no, Bachmann is in it for the money, the power and her insatiable ego. she has constructed a wall of lies, pr and a fantasy image that she is trying to sell. what makes her more dangerous and at the same time more vunerable than palin is how she has knowingly exploited the publics fascination with her sensationalistic outrageous statements. palin probably has done more to help bring about the demise of the Tweet as a credible method intelligent communication, let's face it, she probably ruined the brand....but Bachmann will say anything for effect.
    On the other hand, both her, her family and her husband have a long history of scamming the system for their own personal gain. How much money has she collected in federal funds for her "selfless" temporary adoptions of foster children, who then she turned around and exploited for her image? How much federal money has she accepted for her "home skuling"? which she turns around and exploits to destroy public education at the expense of the crooks behind the charter school corporation groups?
    How much money has her simple agri business farming family taken in subsidies, while denying the rights of honest poor independent farmers to collect the same subsidies?
    How much has (as you tipped me, doggone) hubby store bought diploma doctor Marcus accepted in Federal Medicare funding. BTW, if he's not a real doctor and only plays one on TV, how does he get away with prescribing serious pain killing meds for Michelle's migraines?
    These people got away with this stuff because they remained low level players, below the horizon of scrutiny, but now the klieg lights of reality are focused on them because of Michelles demented narcissism.
    She was the next bright and shiny object which emerged after the last Republican candidate debate. She is in the spotlight now, but already, the sharks in the Republican party are circling, smelling blood.

    It will be very interesting watching Rick Perry self destruct as he tries to destroy Mitt Romney. There is no one of character or substance in the line up...

    ReplyDelete